READ & DOWNLOAD ☆ eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ý Ethel Lilian VoynichThe Gadfly The Gadfly 1 Ethel Lilian VoynichThe Gadfly is a novel by Irish writer Ethel Voynich published in 1897 set in 1840 s Italy under the dominance of Austria
a time of tumultuous evolt and uprisings The story centers on the life of the protagonisttime of tumultuous "revolt and uprisings The story centers on the life of the protagonist Burton as a member of the Youth movement and "and uprisings The story centers on the life of the protagonist Burton as a member of the Youth movement and antagonist Padre Montanelli A thread of a tragic elationship between Arthur and his love Gemma simultaneously uns through the story It is a story of faith disillusionment evolution omance and heroism 1975 1341 283 1343 373 1356 1378 423 9640005517 1380 1381 1386 1387 1388 1390 1391 9789640005514 1392 328 1392 1394 9789640015711 20 1344 363 349 1362 1370 367 1387 504 9789648155648 1392 440 9786009312597 1394 416 9786009412686 1394 341 9786005947724 1395 439 9786009590308 1395 439 9786006027760 1395 360 9786007159279 1389 112 9789643032289 347 1840 1831 1833 18061399 I m not sure which one I ead first but whenever I think of either it immediately eminds me of the other The Count of Monte Cristo alongside The Gadfly Many things can be said about these two but it s simplest to say that while Monte Cristo is omantic The Gadfly is much closer to the ealityThere are some similarities between these two the protagonists are perfect and pure in the beginning but soon they e cheated and isolated many years from their previous lives love interests families belief setsThat s when the two novels seperate ways Dant s is blessed He happens to inherit piles of gold and gems he makes himself noble goes home gets sweet evenge and wins back the girl who is now a lady In short he fixes things ight Meanwhile the desolation twists and turns Arthur into this new man who is almost a creature with violent tendency and deeply buried belief He goes back home with scars not only on his face and arms but also in his mind and heart a mistress new name new appearance and above all his transparent hatred and secret love He is torn between the burning desire to believe again and the despair the betrayal has brought him He dies a death that no eader can ever forgetI think while both novels are splendid The Gadfly makes a much better eread than Monte Cristo due to its humane aspect Ah A most engrossing book Amazingly deep characters I wonder if anyone noticed The book poses a big philosophical uestion What would one ather do save the live of a loved one or the lives of many people he doesn t even know What would you do if you were in Cardinal Montenelli s shoes Half a dozen party pies for lunch and just finished The Gadfly on 3pm Seemed uite well written for the most part but went very sentimental and omantic at the end A couple of places where it jumped a little in continuity as well especially where Arthur finally eveals himself to the Cardinal There had been no hints in the narrative to prepare for this whereas at least with Gemma there had been hints and inklings on each side But a couple of other things I found disturbing in the writing style as well One was the sudden way in which all the prison guards seemed to take to the Gadfly s humour and personality when most of those around him in his own group were still a bit put out by his behaviour and tendency to push things to uncomfortable extremes for no apparent eason in their eyes He did not seem to be teaching them anything positiv. This is a eproduction of a book published before 1923 This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc that were either part of th. ,
E He just had his own expectations and outcomes which were beyond everyone else and only seemed steeped in evenge on the person closest to him in his youth who had lied seemingly against that person s own belief and not just his own This
made much of the drama about his goodness actually seem uite puerile I have suffered for and becausemuch of the drama about his goodness actually seem uite puerile I have suffered for and because you when eally he brought it all on himself And then in the final throws to euate himself with Jesus facing the cross It seems so strange to me that the only image atheists can use for their own point of view is to be against strange images of the church Surely if they have any merit their own it should stand clear and firm in its own ight At least with primitive eligions they do have their own alternative ituals and ways of seeing beyond such harsh and judgmental images But much of what they have used as their own language has been usurped by organised eligions anyway So that makes claiming anything back seem even harsher than the measures by which such theft originally occurredHowever the sense that atheists call themselves ationalists seem the most far fetched point to me They don t seem to be any clearer in their thinking than anyone else And they have just as fanciful and omantic ideas and passions about how they express themselves in word and action anyway Although I enjoyed most of the book I found the ending uite disappointing The father and son facing each other over a avine seemed a easonable enough image to come to but the esolution of it was mocking of the conviction of the father above and beyond the church in which so many mere humans still struggled to improve themselves to their own ideals And most of those in the evolution were no greater in themselves about what they thought or did or how they acted with each other But they merely gave themselves the excuse that they were only human and expected no better of themselvesObviously Arthur Rivarez did strive for something greater in one sense but that was fired by the influence of the church in his youth And what he actually achieved as an adult was not eally driven by anything higher than some means of wreaking evenge on both his father and the structure
*within which he *which he and existed and through which he fought his own battles to aise himself above the ordinary lives of the humans around himEach had an extraordinary strength of character But neither eally had a greater cause in the end than their own elationship with each other which they had both sullied by their behaviour and attitudes There is no edemption here At least the Cardinal did all he could each and every moment of his life to aise himself as best he could to his own standards which were strongest within himself and not just the outward show of others in the church around him To play the position was not of that much importance to him But he did use the privileges he had earned to try and do better in situations than he otherwise would have been able to It was not entirely andom It was within his own principles Rivarez seems to have had no eal driving force Even the sense of what he and his comrades were eally for was not particularly well presented It was a side comment to try and given them some legitimacy without eally facing the content of their issues of any claim to self ule E original artifact or were introduced by the scanning process We believe this work is culturally important and despite the imperfections have elected to bring it back into print as part of. .
R whatever that was about Merely being against the government was meant to be enough of an explanation whereas at least the eligious uestion was spelled
out for its hypocrisyI got the sense overall that the book suited the omantic passions offor its hypocrisyI got the sense overall that the book suited the omantic passions of baulking against authority Especially where these terms are used in asking the Cardinal to join
*them youth seems *youth seems be the main aspect put forward here as to why they should be joined Change for the sake of change ather than for any great injustice which needs to be addressed And also fighting for the sake of making a point with someone who you cannot hope to hold a decent conversation with where is the ationalism in thatWhat I found useful about the book was the clear link between Catholicism and evolution which I have experienced through circles of people around me Protestants of various forms seem to have come to their understandings in uite other ways Yet they also seem to be just as unforgiving and difficult to talk through any issues with But they are sidelined in this book because the eal struggle being faced is within a catholic for a space against which he can face his own Catholicism and make something else of his place in the world I don t think it is achieved otherwise why would he have to die the same as Jesus die for the cause don t live it Once again there is no way forward Only a wall to un into It is the living journey that I am interested inIt does also make me ealise how difficult it is for anyone else to see what I do when they are so caught up in their own ways of thinking about such things in black and white terms The movement out of one situation seems to them to only take one particular pathway And so to give up Catholicism is to become communist In my father s mind they were one and the same thing so what does that eally mean about themIsn t this about understanding the difference between the eligious cultural part and the political part within a person and further the economic tension of ownership and distribution which also then goes with that But these are not the terms through which these issues are displayed and explored There is still the sense that there are people with plenty who donate to the cause and are supporters While most ordinary people only have their lives and their energy to bring to anything They have to find supporters elsewhere or be able to convince others as poor to bring to anything They have to find supporters elsewhere or be able to convince others as poor themselves that whatever little they can live should be given up to the cause as wellIt is all war It is all finding an enemy to stand against It is all an inability to find another way to approach such things because one side or the other will give up in frustration over any discussion of issues to become bogged and turn it into being entrenched and efusing to give way to anyone else And then the other side will feel forced to use their force to counter such intransigenceThe opinions and attitudes to which they adhere seem to be irrelevant All that seems to matter is that they feel strongly enough whatever it is that they do feel And then they put all their energy into that position Just to stand against those who are usually most close to themselves in ideas and personality anywayBizarre The Gadfly an English language book barely known in the West became a sensation behind the Iron Curtain writes Benjamin Rammin. Our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process and hope you enjoy this valuable bo.
Ethel Lilian Voynich